Tucker Logs On to X, Makes Strong Comments on Iran, Mark Levin
Issue #290 | Because he's awesome
Tucker had some extra time on his hands Wednesday night and decided to jump on social media and take aim at Mark Levin, claiming in a long diatribe on X that Levin had visited the White House and was “lobbying for war with Iran.
There’s already plenty of articles being blasted onto the internet to rebut Tucker’s comments about Levin and the situation with Iran. It’s a mixed bag for me. Tucker can think and say and type whatever he wants, and people can disagree.
Levin, no doubt, chimed in with a response on X:
He burps again.
Yes, I know ... Carlson has become a loathsome ass who is increasingly unhinged and pathetic. Our nation's enemies love him, as do certain vile and weird conspiracy theorists he promotes.
I will address him, again, and his barely literate and utterly incoherent social media ramblings on radio tonight. But the good news is, the more he talks and writes, the less relevant and more poisonous he becomes.
It’s clear Levin is no fan of Tucker and probably isn’t subscribing to my newsletter anytime soon. But hey, who wouldn’t be stomping mad if they were the subject of a long and negative social media post millions of people are going to look at.
So the great Tucker-Levin battle of 2025 is just heating up.
Mediaite notes that this isn’t the first time Levin and Carlson have gone at it.
Last month, Carlson criticized Levin over his attacks on Trump Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, musing that “If you’re calling Steve Witkoff an anti-Semite on Twitter, like, you know you’re losing, right?”
“Don’t screw with me, you little bastard!” Levin warned Carlson on his radio show after the dig.
Here’s how the Tucker rant gets started…..
Mark Levin was at the White House today, lobbying for war with Iran. To be clear, Levin has no plans to fight in this or any other war. He’s demanding that American troops do it. We need to stop Iran from building nuclear weapons, he and likeminded ideologues in Washington are now arguing.
They’re just weeks away. If this sounds familiar, it's because the same people have been making the same claim since at least the 1990s. It’s a lie.
In fact, there is zero credible intelligence that suggests Iran is anywhere near building a bomb, or has plans to. None.
Anyone who claims otherwise is ignorant or dishonest. If the US government knew Iran was weeks from possessing a nuclear weapon, we’d be at war already.
Iran knows this, which is why they aren’t building one. Iran also knows it’s unwise to give up its weapons program entirely. Muammar Gaddafi tried that and wound up sodomized with a bayonet.
As soon as Gaddafi disarmed, NATO killed him. Iran’s leaders saw that happen. They learned the obvious lesson. So why is Mark Levin once again hyperventilating about weapons of mass destruction? To distract you from the real goal, which is regime change — young Americans heading back to the Middle East to topple yet another government.
Virtually no one will say this out loud. America’s record of overthrowing foreign leaders is so embarrassingly counterproductive that regime change has become a synonym for disaster.
Officially, no one supports it. So instead of telling the truth about their motives, they manufacture hysteria: “A country like Iran can never have the bomb! They’ll nuke Los Angeles! We have to act now!”
They don’t really mean this, and you can tell they don’t by what they omit. At least two of Iran’s neighbors — both Islamic nations — already have nuclear weapons. That fact should scare the hell out of Mark Levin. Yet for some reason he never mentions it.
How come? Because it’s not the weapons he hates. It’s the ideology of the Iranian government, which is why he’s lobbying to overthrow it.
It goes without saying that there are very few Trump voters who’d support a regime change war in Iran. Donald Trump has argued loudly against reckless lunacy like this. Trump ran for president as a peace candidate.
That’s what made him different from conventional Republicans.
It’s why he won. A war with Iran would amount to a profound betrayal of his supporters. It would end his presidency. That may explain why so many of Trump’s enemies are advocating for it.
If you have a question, or would like to sponsor the newsletter, please email Jeff at TCIAnewsletter@gmail.com.
Thanks, and have a great day!
Levin is a war monger, some of his constitutional experience and knowledge is great but his personal hate and war mongering is greater than his personal opinions.
He needs to remember that if we want his opinion, we will whistle for him, otherwise he is irrelevant.